Visual Music was born in Modernism; consequently it carried a lot of ideas and aesthetics from Modern Art. Modernistic features of early Visual Music showed significant elements of abstraction, creating art for art’s sake and an avoidance to imitate the physical world. Continuing the theme of Modernism, artists attempted to produce works that had no reference whatsoever to physical reality, much like the trends of Abstract Expressionism and Formalism in painting.
In modernism, the artist has full control of the concept and outcome, whereas the work itself becomes aesthetically and philosophically self-conscious, self-critical and self-referential. This can be seen in Greenberg’s ‘Modern Painting’ (1960), where he labels Kant ‘the first real modernist’ because he was the philosopher who initiated the self-criticism tendency in the nineteenth century; a tendency that generated modernist thinking. Moreover, modernism was a reaction to the long tradition of realism and bourgeois predilections of that century (Barth, 1984; Graff, 1973). In previous art movements, such as classical, religious, renaissance and romanticism, the painting was the medium to represent historical events, religious scenes or people.
Music in contrast to visual arts (painting or sculpture) was autonomous and self-defined without the necessity to represent something from the physical world. Instead, music was defined by its own elements, such as rhythm, tempo, and melody, and it also had the ability to evoke emotions without the need to use images or a narrative. Abstract painters tried to follow this route of musical autonomy by creating paintings that did not express any concepts or narratives. The protagonists are no longer kings or landscapes but the painting itself: the rhythm of succeeding colour along with the abstract shapes as well as the texture of the materials. For Greenberg, this was the epitome of modern art as it represents and expresses nothing else but itself (Maker, 2000). Another modernistic trend of traditional Visual Music is the naming of the works with titles that simply describe the visual (or sometimes the sound). In this way the works are independent of any narrative,1 have deeper meanings2 and may avoid any reference to the physical world.3 Works such as these include: ‘Squares’ (1934), ‘Composition in Blue’ (1935) by Oscar Fischinger, ‘Dots’ (1940), ‘Loops’ (1940), ‘Stars and Stripes’ (1940), ‘Lines: Vertical’ (1960) and ‘Lines: Horizontal’ (1962) by McLaren, to name a few.4
Early Visual Music works were produced by drawings or scratches directly onto film. The aim of the artist was to imitate the rhythmical elements of music with the pace the graphics, colours and lights appear, move and disappear (Mollaghan, 2015). For this reason, the artists, while making their visuals, were listening to a specific music or sound at the same time. When Visual Music was presented to audience, on occasion it was played with music and sometimes it was screened silently. A good example of one of the earliest works created on this subject is ‘Diagonal Symphony’ by Viking Eggeling (1924). In this abstract animation, there are white geometrical objects appearing and disappearing on the screen. With little movement of the objects, the real focus was placed on how these simple objects transform from one to another. This silent film and the movement of different shapes designed in Art Deco fashion did not represent anything concrete. As the shapes moved, there was no real representation of reality and the whole work seemed abstract. ‘Diagonal Symphony’ and other similar early Visual Music works are removed from physical reality for the following characteristics5:
After curating New York Digital Salon’s Abstract Visual Music project in 2005 that included international works of contemporary Visual Music, Jack Ox and Cindy Keefer (re)defined contemporary Visual Music as algorithmically operated digital images and placed the submitted works of Visual Music into four categories (Ox; Keefer, 2006)7:
The methodology used for this study collected qualitative data by identifying what are the most popular visual trends regarding the imagery used in the practice of contemporary Visual Music. As mentioned in the literature review, due to the fact that traditional Visual Music trends where always in the line of abstraction, this research tested whether the contemporary Visual Music follows traditional abstraction or whether it has moved towards representation of experienced reality. This study used 50 works presented in the Sound Image colloquiums in 2016 and 2017. These case studies were selected by random sampling and further content analysis categorised these works into the following:
From the research, it occurs that 60% of the works that were submitted in the Sound Image conferences show exact synchronisation of image and sound. Every time a sound event occurs, a corresponding visual event will occur at the same time – this is often a movement, a change of shape, an introduction of a new graphic element or a scene cut. The duration of the visual event is usually identical to the duration of the sonic event. This exact correspondence of image and sound can also be noticed in real life as sensory experience – when a sound is sensed, it is often accompanied by a corresponding visual sensation. For example, the sound of a car; the sound of rain falling onto the window; a person talking.
In the 40% of the audio-visual works that were submitted, there was either a loose synchronisation between image and sound or no synchronisation at all. Loose synchronisation happens when there is a correspondence of image and sound in the aesthetics and pace. However, this does not mean that every sonic event will necessarily have an exact corresponding visual event. For instance, in Matthew Grouse’s ‘Eye of the Storm’ (2017) the slow pace of the sound is similar to the slow movement of the colourful ink patterns, which creates a homogenous aesthetic but, at the same time, not every single sound event has corresponding visuals in this work.
Interestingly enough, the vast majority of the works (62%) continue the tradition of using abstract visualisations. Regardless of whether the sound event is composed by musical instruments, vocals, real world recordings or entirely computer generated electroacoustic sounds; the visuals remain abstract with minimum or no-reference to the physical world and the experienced reality. These abstractions are usually computer-generated graphics that sometimes have the appearance of particles as in ‘F.A.K.120 Video Triptych’ (2015) by Brian Hernandez or patterns as in Sequencial – RaumMerzGeist (2016) by MERZfunder and ‘Synthetic Electro Replicant’ (2016) by Dave Payling. The visuals can also be completely minimal. This can be seen in the live performance of Ryan Jordan ‘Possession Trance’ where visualisation of sound is produced merely by strobe lights.
Through this research, it was established that 28% of the examined works are hybrid – they belong somewhere in the middle of representation and abstraction:
Images are representational, realistic or clearly imitate the experienced world in only 10% of the audio-visual works.
Apart from the representational imagery, the illusion of the three-dimensional space is an imitation of experienced reality and physical space. It is noticeable that regardless of the appearance of the visuals (abstract, representational or hybrid), a significant number of works (30%) attempts the mimesis of the third dimension. In 20% of the works, three-dimensional graphics are blended with the two dimensional, therefore creating hybrid aesthetics. In some cases, abstract graphics seem to create temporary illusions of three dimensional space, as it appears in the work of Jean Piché, ‘Skin Lines’.
It is fair to acknowledge that there are a few limitations in this research, which may not give the exact insight into current trends of Visual Music practice. The Sound Image conferences are taking place in London, and although artists of different nationalities submitted their works, it is only fair to assume that some artists living out of the UK were perhaps less aware of the conference. Apart from the possible lack of awareness, some artists living abroad may have found it inconvenient to participate in the event even in case of their work being selected for presentation. Again, as the conference is held in London, due to perhaps location, language barrier and other similar reasons, it can be assumed that this study mostly represents western Visual Music.
Furthermore, the works that were submitted in 2016 and 2017 were not necessarily produced in the same year of submission, yet this study does not separate them into different years but rather treats them equally as a whole. Therefore, there could be slightly differences in approaches that were not considered by this study.
As this conference is mostly related to Visual Music, there might be artists who consider their work to be outside the Visual Music genre; however, the opinion of the artist was not considered in this study.
In total there were more than 100 works submitted in the two years of the conference. However, this study did not examine all works. It examined 50 randomly selected works, 25 from each conference, in order to give an honest picture of the visual trends in Visual Music practice. The data of Sound Image 2016 fairly matched the data of Sound Image 2017, however it should be acknowledged that 50% of the works that were left out could have influenced the outcome of the study if considered.
In order to simplify the outcome of the study for better understanding, data was placed into different categories with reoccurring themes. This could be seen as a limitation because all fifty works were not separately analysed in this document.
The results of this research show that the visual trends in Visual Music are in alignment with some contemporary practices of audio-visual and digital arts. The main trends in contemporary practices seemed to follow three categories: pure abstraction (Manovich, 2004), hybrid media and realistic graphics (often in virtual environments) (Manovich, 2007; Grau 2003). Pure abstraction in contemporary practices uses a form of reduction to break down graphics to the simplest shapes and then, it reconstructs them into more complex forms. Hybrid media’s main element is the amalgamation of different representational or abstract images, such as edited images, 3D graphics or text. Lastly, realistic graphics can be found in visual effects, video games, and virtual reality. However, taking into consideration all works examined by this practice, contemporary visual trends tend to match the first two categories as opposed to the third one.
Abstraction continues to be the predominant trend of Visual Music. Through this research, it was established even contemporary Visual Music artists are heavily influenced by the abstract tradition of Visual Music. It was found that the medium (computer) tends to be the main influence of the visual aesthetics of a given piece. The visual trends of contemporary Visual Music often are abstract compositions produced by heavily edited and overlapping representational images; computer generated simple shapes put together in the creation of complex compositions; imagery that resembles digital aesthetics such as glitches, noise, particles and data visualisations. On the other hand, there are small steps towards mimesis of the physical world. This can be seen through the use of representational recognisable images and the more prominent use of the third dimension.
The author has no competing interests to declare.
Emmanouil Kanellos is Senior Lecturer in BA Graphic Design & BA Animation Programmes in University of Greenwich. Kanellos is a PhD candidate with an interest in Visual Music, Virtual Reality, and 3D technology. He has presented his research in UK, Europe and USA. Throughout the years Emmanouil Kanellos has worked both as 3D Animator, Character Designer and CG Artist, collaborating with several advertising and design agencies (Saatchi & Saatchi, Seven-Shuffles, Udox) in London, Athens and Japan. His work has been shown in various places such as UK National TV and International channels. Emmanouil Kanellos also directs and produce 3D mapping projection artworks across the UK in collaboration with various video and sound artists.
Manovich, L 2004 Abstraction and Complexity. Available at: www.manovich.net. (Accessed: 20th December 2017).
Manovich, L 2007 Understanding Hybrid Media. Available at: www.manovich.net. (Accessed: 20th December 2017).
Mollaghan, A 2015 The Visual Music Film. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137492821
Ox, J and Keefer, C 2006 On Curating Recent Digital Abstract Visual Music. Retrieved October 30, 2017, from Center for Visual Music: http://www.centerforvisualmusic.org/Ox_Keefer_VM.htm.
University of Greenwich 2017 SOUND/IMAGE: Exploring sonic and audio-visual practice. University of Greenwich, available at: www.gre.ac.uk/ach/events/soundimage (Accessed: 20th December 2017).